fogtender
(Tourist)
09/16/07 10:12 AM
Re: A Spectacular timeline: Changing sea level by 1 m

You are correct, we are stewards of our enviorment. But the movement for "Global Warming" has been sucking the energy in a direction that is for a power play for the elite.

People believe that driving an electric car is more eco friendly, when in fact that is more toxic that a conventional car. You have thousands of pounds of lead acid batteries and such that have to be replaced every four to five years (at quite an expense too). You need coal power plants to create the energy to charge the car, so the fuel used is not much of a trade off in the overall picture, just out of sight, out of mind mentality is what these folks believe.

Coal plants can have scrubbers installed to clean the exhaust that they emit, but nobody wants them. Nuclear power plants emit nothing but steam from the cooling towers, yet they have a possible downside too, not to mention a target for terrorist to aim for and waste problems of their own and nobody wants them.

Wind is a good source of power, but nobody wants them in their backyard because of the "Looks" and noise they make when they operated with the "Wooshing" sound of the blade tips going though the air.

Even Solar cells create a major hazmat problem when they are manufactured and only last a few dozen years at best. I use them at my cabin for power, and they do save hauling fuel for the generator. Again, the downside is the cost of buying them and I have a bank of batteries that need replacing every five years or so.

Burning water is possible but not politcally correct because there is no way to tax it so they say that it is not feasable to do. Fact is that spliting H20 has been done for centuries since the wet cell battery was created. If you don't believe it, stick your face with a lit smoke in your mouth over a car battery when it is charging, what does the warning say.... "Explosive, no open flames"! Well when your battery is low, what do you refill it with....water, and when it is low again, what do you fill it with....water....duh.

Electrolisis action breaks the water into one part Oxg and two parts Hydrogen and when they burn, they turn back into water vapor. You can run a power plant off of water and still create surplus power at little cost to the enviorment. But it's hard to create a tax base when you can sneak water from your house's sink into your car with a fuel cell, and that would be a loss of trillions of dollars to the World from taxes and oil based industry.

The elite travel in fuel guzzling private jets and tell us to walk in the name of "Global Warming", something really stinks somewhere.

But then the current underlying issue of a global war is looming and raising it's ugly head. If everyone burns water, the mideast goes broke overnite while sitting on oceans of oil and it creates more of a black hole for poverty there and a breeding ground for people wanting to kill everyone else in the name of God, because all they have going for them is all the Virgins in Heaven waiting for them after doing God's work.

In the meantime, I get to cut a little less firewood for the upcoming warmer winter and use a lot less heating oil. The only thing I can depend on with all this. is a tax bill at the end of the year and the impending old age that comes from all this.... The rest will sort itself out, either though an attack common sense (which I don't hold much hope for) or major distruction of the planet as a whole to get the people's attention of those that remain.



earth.google.com    bbs.keyhole.com

*
UBB.threads™ 6.5.1.1