Thanks to some assistance from one of our comrades in arms on this search effort who is mostly lurking here, I now have the data I need to process in order to gain access to the 0909-10553 imagery. I will try to update my database such that people can gain access to this image set tomorrow (I need to go to bed right now).

It does appear, however, that this imagery was never reviewed via MTurk HIT assignments (as there were no reported HITs). This leads to a question that I would like folks here to weigh in on. Since this imagery has not been looked at, should I shift the automatic overlay assignments to this image set and then cycle back to the other imagery after we have completed a pass of the 0909-10553 imagery?

It would provide us with new imagery to look at for a bit. Currently folks are working on the 0909-10491 image set and I would expect given current rates of imagery review it could take us a week or two to get to the 0909-10553 imagery on our current path. If I jumped ahead to the 0909-10553 imagery, once one pass of this imagery had been completed I would return back to where we had left off which would cycle us back to the 0909-10553 imagery for a second pass within a week or two.

What would be really nice is if we could attract some more eyes to be reviewing the imagery as it would be nice to move through the imagery a little faster than we are. Also some real efforts need to process reported MTurk HITs on the Sanborn2.kml overlay and the reports on Violent Skies to see if some really good leads have been reported.

One thing I could do to improve the reported HIT review is deconstruct the Saborn2.kml file and create a separate auto assignment and overlay generation process so that we knew that we were reviewing these reports in a systematic fashion. This would take me a couple days of work, but I think I could come up with something that would work pretty well. What I may want to do with this process is assign user specific keys so that I can ensure each reported HIT was reviewed by two or three different people. What I am thinking is that maybe the best eyes amongst us should be focusing on reviewing reported HITs while the rest of us continue on with the automatic imagery assignment process we are currently using.

I really am thinking we need to start to organize our efforts so that we know who is working on what to make sure we are covering all our bases.