Google
Official Google Earth Download Site

Google Earth Community

Off World >> Our Moon

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
LizardKing623
Tourist


Reged: 01/18/07
Posts: 5
Loc: The United States of Texas.
Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the [Re: Designation1]
      #1139659 - 03/26/08 09:47 PM


removed personal abuse by OP



Edited by danescombe (04/18/08 09:14 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Report this Post  
wylekat
Tourist


Reged: 03/19/08
Posts: 6
Tonight's Menu is CROW..... [Re: LizardKing623]
      #1142534 - 03/31/08 04:05 PM

I'm just going to shut up and let you all decide.
Reply from the Japanese Space Agency:

Dear Brian,

Thank you for your message about KAGUYA.
Unfortunately, since KAGUYA HDTV spatial resolution is more than
100meter and Apollo lander is only less than
3meter, it is impossible to see Apollo lander itself by KAGUYA HDTV.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Report this Post  
Grant_NZ
Tourist


Reged: 03/15/08
Posts: 4
Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the [Re: Designation1]
      #1154174 - 04/18/08 07:06 PM

FYI there is no current photos of the moon landing module that is still supposed to be on the moon, therefore looking closly at the link that is above (in layman terms, go to google earth and see for yourself) and check for yourself.

The surrounding area has all the characteristics of the moon landing site, plus notice that all the photos taken of the "moon landing from NASA" were taken in the same area.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Report this Post  
Felippo
Collection Editor


Reged: 07/18/05
Posts: 1528
Loc: Hameln, Germany
Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the [Re: Grant_NZ]
      #1154465 - 04/19/08 04:25 AM





--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Report this Post  
Abelson
First Post


Reged: 05/28/08
Posts: 1
Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the [Re: Hill]
      #1178497 - 05/28/08 01:20 PM

Quote:

Right

Click here.




hehe, what a silly picture to try and prove the moonlanding. Do me a favour will you? Open the picture, look at all the stones. Note the direction of the stones shadows.
Now look at the guy in the picture, note anything weird with the direction of his shadow?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Report this Post  
HillModerator
Master Guide


Reged: 10/31/04
Posts: 8713
Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the [Re: Abelson]
      #1178912 - 05/29/08 10:32 AM

Quote:

Do me a favour will you? Open the picture, look at all the stones. Note the direction of the stones shadows.





There is nothing inconsistant about the shadows of the rocks and of the astronaut. Please read the rest of the thread as well.

It's too bad we don't have something like the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter in orbit around the Moon. It certainly has the resolution to see smaller details.


Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

MRO's HiRISE camera acquired this dramatic oblique image of Phoenix descending on its parachute. Shown here is a a wider view of the full image, showing a 10 kilometer diameter crater informally called “Heimdall,” and an improved full-resolution image of the parachute and lander.

Although it appears that Phoenix is descending into the crater, it is actually about 20 kilometers in front of the crater. It is difficult to believe that it is in front of the crater because it is so much smaller, but in reality it is, and that's a good thing because landing on the steep rocky slopes of the crater would have been far too exciting (or risky).

Images from the lander clearly show that it sits on a flat plain, although the rim of Heimdall may be visible on the horizon. Given the position and pointing angle of MRO, Phoenix is at about 13 km above the surface, just a few seconds after the parachute opened. This improved image shows some details of the parachute, including the gap between upper and lower sections. At the time of this observation, MRO had an orbital altitude of 310 km, traveling at a ground velocity of 3.4 kilometers/second, and a distance of 760 km to the Phoenix lander.

The image was rotated to a position that seems approximately parallel to the horizon based on the elongation of Heimdall crater, but this is not exact. Thus, although Phoenix appears to hang from the parachute at an angle, as if swaying in the wind, the exact geometry has not yet been determined. The parachute image is very sharp as its apparent motion was straight down the HiRISE TDI (time delay integration) columns. However, the surface of Mars was moving at an angle to the TDI columns, and thus is smeared by a few pixels, although the smear is not apparent at the reduced scale of the image shown here.

The sun is almost directly behind HiRISE, so the parachute should be casting a shadow onto the slope of the crater, but we cannot determine which of many dark spots is the shadow until a detailed geometric analysis has been completed.




Edited by Hill (05/29/08 08:53 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Report this Post  
bullet_time
Tourist


Reged: 06/24/08
Posts: 43
Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the [Re: Abelson]
      #1218869 - 08/14/08 06:25 AM

Yes, there is nothing wrong with the shadows if you look carefully...

I thought it's something more serious!

--------------------
The World is a book, and those who do not travel read only a page. - St. Augustine - My project about Benidorm and the surrounding maps.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Report this Post  
danescombeModerator
Master Guide


Reged: 11/07/05
Posts: 9985
Loc: UK
Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the [Re: bullet_time]
      #1218881 - 08/14/08 06:52 AM

1--Let suppose that NASA faked the moon landings.

2-- Now take a conservative guess at how many professional people would have had to sign up to falsifying one of the biggest science event of the century .


3--Why hasn't one person involved come forward to spill the beans on this massive hoax?. Bearing in mind --The first person to break the story will get very rich.

4--Logic points to the answer ( The landings took place) --However if you do believe it was a massive hoax?--The conspiracy then continues with the silencing of all these professional people.

5--Repeat No 2



footnote--- these would have had to be silenced as well

Edited by danescombe (08/14/08 06:53 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Report this Post  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)




Extra information
0 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  esterrett, Jumble, Kempster, Hill, mcshea98, dulce, jeffryv, Frank_McVey, NormB, Cyclonic, tekgergedan, no_stranger, danescombe, LuciaM, BeadieJay, Noisette, TheLedge, mutex, marinerfan, Delta102, bebop 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 19365

Rate this topic

Jump to

earth.google.com    bbs.keyhole.com

*
UBB.threads™ 6.5.1.1