Quote:

---

I suggest that you reread what I wrote about the accepted concept of beginning a SAR at the last know position of the object of the search. In this case that would be Revelstoke.

Then, later, when you'll come with FACTS, I shall envisage maybe another opinion.

Quote:

---

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

---

I have already said to you that it was not a problem for me, I don't see very well why it is one for you... But we can continue to fight in the pitiful bars for 2 opposite opinions based only on RUMORS and forget totally why we all are here, if you prefer.

---

Dear Mr. Penguin,

I don’t think that this forum is the place for fanciful unfounded assertions as you are attempting to “envisage”. The fact reported is that Boychuk made a position report over Spense Bridge.

Quote from Vangi “When an SAR Officer (PR type) is talking to the media and makes the statement that Ron made a position report over Spense Bridge.. I don’t think even the Enquirer could mess that up..”

To accept your theory one would have to believe that the Canadian SAR officer deliberately lied to the media. I don’t think that you are qualified to make that determination and should refrain from such shenanigans in the future. SAR is serious business and it is no place to just blog around. If you have hard evidence that the SAR officer, 2nd Lieut Alex Cadieux, a spokesman for the Comox 19 Wing, is not credible then post it here or withdraw you allegation.

Post Extras