Google
Official Google Earth Download Site

Google Earth Community System Reliability: HIGH

Off World >> Our Moon

HillModerator
Master Guide


Reged: 10/31/04
Posts: 9206
Loc: Southern California
Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the
      05/29/08 10:32 AM

Quote:

Do me a favour will you? Open the picture, look at all the stones. Note the direction of the stones shadows.





There is nothing inconsistant about the shadows of the rocks and of the astronaut. Please read the rest of the thread as well.

It's too bad we don't have something like the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter in orbit around the Moon. It certainly has the resolution to see smaller details.


Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

MRO's HiRISE camera acquired this dramatic oblique image of Phoenix descending on its parachute. Shown here is a a wider view of the full image, showing a 10 kilometer diameter crater informally called “Heimdall,” and an improved full-resolution image of the parachute and lander.

Although it appears that Phoenix is descending into the crater, it is actually about 20 kilometers in front of the crater. It is difficult to believe that it is in front of the crater because it is so much smaller, but in reality it is, and that's a good thing because landing on the steep rocky slopes of the crater would have been far too exciting (or risky).

Images from the lander clearly show that it sits on a flat plain, although the rim of Heimdall may be visible on the horizon. Given the position and pointing angle of MRO, Phoenix is at about 13 km above the surface, just a few seconds after the parachute opened. This improved image shows some details of the parachute, including the gap between upper and lower sections. At the time of this observation, MRO had an orbital altitude of 310 km, traveling at a ground velocity of 3.4 kilometers/second, and a distance of 760 km to the Phoenix lander.

The image was rotated to a position that seems approximately parallel to the horizon based on the elongation of Heimdall crater, but this is not exact. Thus, although Phoenix appears to hang from the parachute at an angle, as if swaying in the wind, the exact geometry has not yet been determined. The parachute image is very sharp as its apparent motion was straight down the HiRISE TDI (time delay integration) columns. However, the surface of Mars was moving at an angle to the TDI columns, and thus is smeared by a few pixels, although the smear is not apparent at the reduced scale of the image shown here.

The sun is almost directly behind HiRISE, so the parachute should be casting a shadow onto the slope of the crater, but we cannot determine which of many dark spots is the shadow until a detailed geometric analysis has been completed.




Edited by Hill (05/29/08 08:53 PM)

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Report this Post


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the Moon Grant_NZ 03/15/08 01:43 AM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the Moon HillModerator   03/20/08 10:44 PM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the Abelson   05/28/08 01:20 PM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the bullet_time   08/14/08 06:25 AM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the danescombeModerator   08/14/08 06:52 AM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the HillModerator   05/29/08 10:32 AM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the wylekat   03/21/08 05:30 AM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the Designation1   03/23/08 03:36 PM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the Grant_NZ   04/18/08 07:06 PM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the Felippo   04/19/08 04:25 AM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the LizardKing623   03/26/08 09:47 PM
. * * Tonight's Menu is CROW..... wylekat   03/31/08 04:05 PM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the HillModerator   03/21/08 01:12 PM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the wylekat   03/21/08 03:28 PM
. * * Looking for evidence? HillModerator   03/21/08 04:19 PM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the Moon Felippo   03/15/08 03:50 AM
. * * Re: Maybe more proof that they didn't land on the saukko   03/15/08 06:04 AM
. * * Re: I got ya proof, methinks. wylekat   03/19/08 01:00 PM


Extra information
0 registered and 1 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  esterrett, Jumble, Kempster, Hill, mcshea98, dulce, jeffryv, Frank_McVey, NormB, Cyclonic, tekgergedan, no_stranger, danescombe, LuciaM, BeadieJay, Noisette, TheLedge, mutex, marinerfan, Delta102, bebop, MarkAubin 



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 30341

Rate this thread

Jump to

earth.google.com    bbs.keyhole.com

*
UBB.threads™ 6.5.1.1