#53213 - 07/14/05 08:16 AM
Re: Multiple Cache Files
[Re: aussiemac]
|
Traveler
Registered: 05/05/03
Posts: 266
Loc: Geschwenda, Thringen, Germany
|
I think it's possible but too circuitous.
_________________________
Blue Marble & Red Planet-Explorer (sorry, for bad english - it isn't perfect...not yet ;-)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#53214 - 07/14/05 01:16 PM
Re: Multiple Cache Files
[Re: aussiemac]
|
Traveler
Registered: 03/18/03
Posts: 184
Loc: California, USA
|
Yes, You have the technique nailed. It works. Ernie
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#53215 - 07/14/05 01:46 PM
Re: Multiple Cache Files
[Re: neo]
|
Traveler
Registered: 07/11/05
Posts: 5
Loc: Sonoma, CA, USA
|
I've paid for GEPro and moviemaker ... My biggest problem is the $%$%#@! default size of 512 MB ... it is not big enough for even a small tour ... thus everything I try to make into a tour is hostage to the download stream and thge result is pretty mediocre.
_________________________
No Fear. No Conscience. No Mistakes
Perfect Killer
[email]lperdue@ideaworx.com [/email]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#53216 - 07/14/05 02:59 PM
Re: Multiple Cache Files
[Re: triphazard]
|
Traveler
Registered: 06/01/05
Posts: 56
|
I haven't tried it yet. I thought renaming caches might work. Just a matter of putting downloads into useful groups, like countries,states, continents or towns etc.
Would be easier if Google would make the cache size extendable though. Just getting us back on line to look at advertising isn't the way to go.
With layers switched off, we don't need to view ads unless we want to.
I'd like to be able to edit the layers to suit my own purpose too.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#53217 - 07/14/05 06:49 PM
Re: Multiple Cache Files
[Re: LewPerdue]
|
Sysop
Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 1882
Loc: SF Bay Area, CA
|
Quote:
and thge result is pretty mediocre.
Which might be true if you're recording in real time with a poor internet connection, but which is a complete falsehood if you're using the High Quality "tour mode" option, which will automatically stream in all required data for maximum resolution while it writes the file.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#53218 - 07/14/05 10:15 PM
Re: Multiple Cache Files
[Re: ink_polaroid]
|
Traveler
Registered: 06/01/05
Posts: 56
|
what you say is true too! but what about a bigger cache! or a method to save caches. what's the policy? If we're happy offline, we're not using bandwidth or spending money.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#53219 - 07/15/05 08:46 PM
Re: Multiple Cache Files
[Re: aussiemac]
|
Master Guide
Registered: 05/06/03
Posts: 1983
Loc: Missouri, US
|
Quote:
...If we're happy offline, we're not using bandwidth or spending money.
But then you could just download a 300 GB cache, and then just quit paying... Oh wait, its free, never mind. 
Seriously, I have never gotten an answer about the cache size, but I am suspicious that there are performance issues. maybe some internal program aspect that is just hard to upgrade.
I became interested when I was giving club presentations at places with (gasp!) no broadband connection. Most of those places have been abandoned, or connected, so I somewhat lost interest.
_________________________
--------------------
With no known exceptions, the cost of internal trust, efficiency and loyalty is external distrust. The "us against them" is not an optional feature, if there were some way to preserve the loyalties and the tremendous benefits of internal trust without paying the cost of the ferocious xenophobia, then that would be just what we want to do. But we don't know how to do that.
--Daniel Dennett
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/allinthemind/stories/2007/1812733.htm
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#53220 - 07/15/05 11:48 PM
Re: Multiple Cache Files
[Re: Periboob]
|
Traveler
Registered: 06/01/05
Posts: 56
|
You're probably right! If you've got cheap, fast broadband, there's not much point in big cache size. I'm not sure if it loads quicker when offline, but its worth me checking. Thanks....
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#53221 - 07/17/05 10:19 AM
Re: Multiple Cache Files
[Re: aussiemac]
|
Traveler
Registered: 07/17/05
Posts: 6
Loc: Cape Town, South Africa
|
What would really be useful is for one to be able to specify a common location for a cache file that multiple users could reference...for example, in a corporate LAN, a common cache on a local server. Some corporates charge for bandwidth used. I've tried using a network location but the program isn't multi-user enabled w.r.t. cache data.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: BeadieJay, bebop, Cyclonic, Delta102, dulce, esterrett, Frank_McVey, Grim_Reaper, Hill, jeffryv, Jumble, Kempster, LuciaM, marinerfan, Noisette, NormB, no_stranger, tekgergedan
|
|